From xod@sixgirls.org Tue Aug 14 10:32:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 14 Aug 2001 17:32:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 20697 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2001 17:31:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 14 Aug 2001 17:31:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (64.152.7.13) by mta3 with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 17:31:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7EHVOH02770 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:31:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:31:24 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9613 On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Jay Kominek wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, John Cowan wrote: > > > Originally "du" was in its own selma'o, DU, and was permitted only > > as a selbri_B_132 (IIRC). But I somewhat hastily over-generalized it > > into selma'o GOhA, thus permitting some highly dubious constructs like > > tanru with du. > > Highly dubious? du is useful but underused because people are afraid of getting it wrong and hearing the shrieks from the "logically stringent". le du is used as a "clever" alternative to le me. But in a lujvo? ---- "I have never been active in politics or in any act against occupation, but the way the soldiers killed Mizyed has filled me with hatred and anger. Now I'm ready to carry out a suicide attack inside Israel," one of the witnesses said.