From ragnarok@pobox.com Wed Aug 15 05:14:05 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 15 Aug 2001 12:14:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 18579 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2001 12:14:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 15 Aug 2001 12:14:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Aug 2001 12:14:04 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A79EF18C00E0; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:14:22 -0400 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Chomskyan universals and Lojban Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:14:04 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9648 >Does anyone know >i) either any counter-examples in natural languages? None that I can think of. >ii) or why lojban is this way round? My two theories: 1. It is more common to discuss sellers than buyers, and 'le vecnu' is more succinct than 'le se vecnu.' 2. I have heard that choices of gismu were based on Basic English, which does not have a word for buy. But I just checked, and that doesn't work because it doesn't have a word for 'sell' either. --la kreig.daniyl. 'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci .i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74