From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sun Aug 26 04:56:46 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 26 Aug 2001 11:56:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 61439 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 11:56:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Aug 2001 11:56:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2001 11:56:42 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.253.89.27]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
          id <20010826115641.LRRG6330.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
          for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:56:41 +0100
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: jai fi'o lojbo fe'u spuda (was: RE: mine, thine, hisn, hern,itsn ourn, yourn and theirn
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 12:55:54 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMKEPPEJAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <v0300780bb7ae0d624638@[128.195.186.34]>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10130

Nick:
> cu'u la and.
> 
> >fo loi se jinvi be mi ge la xorxes so'a roi gi mi ji'i so'e roi ku drani
> 
> >se nu mi lifri loi nu la xorxes jinvi kei kei so'i so'i be mi carmi zdile
> >joi melbi joi toldunku
> 
> *stares long enough to work this out*
> 
> Oh, you mean:
> 
> .i fo loi se jinvi be mi
>   nu'ige la xorxes. so'aroi
>   nu'ugi mi ji'e so'eroi ku
> drani
> 
> (You need termsets for that. Hope you can elide that nu'u!)

I know. But I couldn't see an alternative parse for it, so decided not
to use termsets.
 
> .i nu mi lifri loi nu la xorxes. jinvi
>   so'iso'i ke carmi zdile joi melbi joi toldunku ke'e be mi

How come you can miss out those {kei}s? Doesn't {so'i ... mi}
become x2 of jinvi instead of x1 of nu?

> (What you actually said was more like:
> 
> .i so'iso'i lo pe mi carmi zdile joi melbi joi toldunku
> cu nu mi lifri loi nu la xorxes. jinvi
> 
> Which I guess makes sense too. 

That's what I meant!! "There are many things delightful etc.
to me that are events wherein I experience xorxes's opining.

So hang on, then. You thought I meant what? Let's see: There's
an event wherein I experience Jorge's opining many things that
are delightful etc to me. -- Close, but subtly different from
what I wished to say.

--And