From araizen@newmail.net Mon Aug 27 08:01:33 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 27 Aug 2001 15:01:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 27513 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 14:49:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Aug 2001 14:49:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.54.158) by mta3 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 14:49:54 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer ([62.0.180.11]) by out.newmail.net ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:50:52 +0200 Message-ID: <06cd01c12f10$100aa5c0$87b4003e@oemcomputer> To: References: Subject: Re: lo'e (was: Re: [lojban] ce'u Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:59:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 From: "Adam Raizen" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10155 la and. cusku di'e > What I like about this is firstly that it would settle what lo'e and > le'e mean: > > lo'e gerku (be zo'e) > = lo(i) ka ce'u gerku zo'e > = lo(i) ka gerku [under most-favoured proposals] > > le'e gerku (be zo'e) > = le(i) ka ce'u gerku zo'e > = le(i) ka gerku [under most-favoured proposals] What is the difference between "le ka gerku" and "lo ka gerku"? Is there more than one "ka gerku", given a certain value for all those "zo'e"s? mu'o mi'e .adam