From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Thu Aug 23 06:27:30 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 23 Aug 2001 13:27:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 64895 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 13:26:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Aug 2001 13:26:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 13:26:46 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:05:15 +0100 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:32:09 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 14:31:43 +0100 To: jjllambias , lojban Subject: Re: status of ka (was Re: [lojban] x3 of du' Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 9974 Xorxes: #I don't see the point of making abstruse rules that don't take #into account how we actually use or want to use it. What normally #used predicate ever takes a ka with more than two ce'us? I know #some predicates _can_ take such monsters, but are there any that #would under normal circumstances? se valsi, se bridi, du la'e lo selbri. [Wow! dig those dactyls!] Plus any other predicates with an sumti place for meanings. --And.