From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Sep 23 11:54:41 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 23 Sep 2001 18:54:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 28548 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2001 18:54:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 23 Sep 2001 18:54:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta3 with SMTP; 23 Sep 2001 18:54:37 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id AFEE5C5A00CE; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:54:38 -0400 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] ko'a Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:54:37 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <001e01c14454$ee59f8e0$d224ca3e@oemcomputer> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10984 >How long does ko'a keep the same value? If I introduce {le brode goi ko'a} >and later say {le broda goi ko'a}, can it be assumed that the most likely >meaning is {ko'a brode je broda}. To *humanly* reinforce that meaning, I >might choose the second to be {ko'a goi le broda} ; but both in theory have >the same semantic meaning. ko'a keeps its value until given a new one. However, goi just says that ko'a and broda have the same value. So, I can say "ko'a goi ko'e" when neither is assigned, then assign one and have them have the same referent. To get rid of the old value, unfortunately, I believe it is necessary to unassign ALL ko'a- and fo'a-series cmavo. --la kreig.daniyl. 'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci .i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme: 0x5C3A1E74