From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Fri Sep 07 09:08:21 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 16:08:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15671 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 15:57:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 15:57:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta02-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.42) by mta1 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 15:57:52 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.253.84.175]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010907155750.LBWF29790.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:57:50 +0100 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: lo'e (was: Re: [lojban] ce'u Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:57:07 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10543 Xod: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, And Rosta wrote: > > > I think that Jorge's conception of {lo'e} has always been incompatible > > with {lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko}. But {lo'e cinfo cu xabju le friko} > > is objectionable, because it is prone to ambiguity. For example, we > > can discuss the prototypical or archetypal lion, without it then > > being the case that non-atypical lions have been discussed by us. > > Gadri + sumti tail is simply not the right way to do archetypes; it > > clearly calls for some sort of bridi abstraction, such that xabju > > le friko would be within the abstraction, while "discussed by us" > > would be outside. > > Please follow up this suggestion with the appropriate gismu to stick in > su'u2 to achieve the desired result! I don't know how su'u x1 and x2 are supposed to work, and nor do I know how to implement what I argued for above. However, very tentatively, and intuitively, I could start the ball rolling with this: tu'o si'o cinfo kei se su'u ce'u xabju le friko as a way of saying that the archetypal lion archetypally-has the property of living in Africa. As for "We discussed the archetypal lion", I don't know. Maybe mi'a simxu tu'o du'u ce'u ce'u tavla loi su'u be tu'o si'o cinfo All this is just a first stab, and there to be improved on. --And.