From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sat Sep 08 14:43:59 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 8 Sep 2001 21:43:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 55093 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2001 21:43:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Sep 2001 21:43:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Sep 2001 21:43:58 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.42.63]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
          id <20010908214356.GBBV23687.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
          for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 22:43:56 +0100
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] li'i (was: Another stab at a Record on ce'u
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 22:43:11 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCENHEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0109071339140.23696-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10583

Xod:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, And Rosta wrote:
> 
> > > > I don't deny that there must be an experiencer. I just
> > > > strongly question whether the experiencer must be involved in the
> > > > experience bridi.
> > >
> > > How can I experience a bridi if I am not in one of its places?
> >
> > I don't know how to answer that except by the obvious strategy of
> > offering you a bridi with all places filled by something other than
> > the experiencer, and asking if the situation described (e.g. pc's
> > sun setting over the lake, or my Northern Ireland conflict) is
> > experienceable, and hoping that you will say Yes.
> 
> In claiming {li'i klama} has a meaning which is not one of {li'i klama FA
> ce'u}, you're claiming that "I experienced going (klama), but I wasn't the
> goer, nor the origin, nor the destination, the vehicle, or the route".
> What exactly are you experiencing then?

Maybe I watched the going. Maybe I felt it. Maybe I felt its wake. Maybe
I experienced it be reading about plans for it. And so on and so on. 

--aND.