From pycyn@aol.com Fri Sep 07 01:32:52 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 08:32:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 17470 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 08:32:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 08:32:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r06.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.102) by mta3 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 08:32:51 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id r.16d.77e6a4 (4012) for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 04:32:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <16d.77e6a4.28c9e02d@aol.com> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 04:32:45 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] A serious but ungeneralized new attempt on Q-kau To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_16d.77e6a4.28c9e02d_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10518 --part1_16d.77e6a4.28c9e02d_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/6/2001 7:58:45 PM Central Daylight Time, a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes: > This Anglan is too pidgin for me to understand. Can you retry > with a slightly closer approximation to Lojban? > > If you think it worth it, that is. > > > all x all y if y is a possible dinner on x then for some z, y's being so > is > > conditioned by z being in the fridge on x. > > What is x? > Gee, I thought mine was closer than yours. I'll work on it. x is an occasion (a day, primarily, I think -- what separates one dinner from another?) That aside, I still have the problem of coordinating {ce'u} without actually going into quantifiers (which is the point of this exercise ultimately, after all). --part1_16d.77e6a4.28c9e02d_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/6/2001 7:58:45 PM Central Daylight Time,
a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes:


This Anglan is too pidgin for me to understand. Can you retry
with a slightly closer approximation to Lojban?

If you think it worth it, that is.

> all x all y if y is a possible dinner on x then for some z, y's being so
is
> conditioned by z being in the fridge on x.   

What is x?

Gee, I thought mine was closer than yours.  I'll work on it.  x is an
occasion (a day, primarily, I think -- what separates one dinner from
another?)
That aside, I still have the problem of coordinating {ce'u} without actually
going into quantifiers (which is the point of this exercise ultimately, after
all).  
--part1_16d.77e6a4.28c9e02d_boundary--