From phma@oltronics.net Sun Sep 09 18:41:22 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 10 Sep 2001 01:41:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 54570 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 01:41:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2001 01:41:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.228) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 01:40:08 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id A59433C54E; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 21:09:43 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Antelopes Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 21:09:40 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01090921094031.05217@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10611 On Sunday 09 September 2001 19:49, Craig wrote: > Base it on bovni. I think you already know my views on fu'ivla, but for > those that don't, I feel they should only be used when necessary, such as > for taxonomy, and that the lower the type the better. Please don't use > .antilope, use bovnrntelopi or whatever for the specific subfamilies - I > dislike type 4s AND think that, as you point out, .antilope is rather > malglico. There is no such word as {bovni}. phma