From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Sep 26 09:14:50 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 26 Sep 2001 16:14:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 67652 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 16:14:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Sep 2001 16:14:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 16:14:49 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
          Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:20:16 +0100
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
          with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:51:17 +0100
Message-Id: <sbb20785.035@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:51:00 +0100
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Dumb answers to good questions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11065

Xod:
#> There are plenty of languages which are different to go around.
#I thought the idea was that Lojban is "more different" than any other,=20

I don't know if anyone's claimed that, but it's a baseless claim, because
AFAIK nobody knows enough about Lojban and the 6000 surviving
natlangs to make a valid judgement.

--And.