Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 28 Sep 2001 21:55:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 61467 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2001 21:55:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 28 Sep 2001 21:55:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2001 21:55:21 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.253.88.199]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
          id <20010928215518.CGUP23687.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
          for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:55:18 +0100
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: "lojban" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Set of answers encore
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:54:36 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMAEFOEMAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <05eb01c1479d$62ecacc0$d8b5003e@oemcomputer>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11176
Content-Length: 890
Lines: 26

Adam:
> la .and cusku di'e
> 
> > Lojban needs an unambiguous way of distinguishing between
> >
> > 'intensional believe':   x1 has the thought that x2 is the case
> >
> > and
> >
> > 'extensional believe':   The states of affairs that x1 believes
> obtain include x2
> 
> How about 'jinvi', 'djuno', 'krici', 'tugni', 'sarxe', etc. all
> default to extensional, and then the intensional sense can be had with
> a tanru or lujvo using 'pensi' (or maybe 'te sidbo'). If x both
> extensionally believes that y and also thinks about or forms an idea
> about y then x intensionally believes that y, no?

Well, pc and Jorge and John seem to think the default is intensional,
and I don't disagree with them, so for 'extensional' I have suggested, 
following pc, making the x2 {da poi go ke'a jetnu gi <BRIDI>}, which 
I think solves all immediate problems that look soluble.

--And.