From araizen@newmail.net Thu Sep 27 14:42:02 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 27 Sep 2001 21:41:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 4791 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2001 21:41:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 27 Sep 2001 21:41:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw2.netvision.net.il) (194.90.1.9)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 21:41:58 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer (ras1-p96.rvt.netvision.net.il [62.0.180.96])
	by mailgw2.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA01179
	for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:41:57 +0200 (IST)
Message-ID: <05eb01c1479d$62ecacc0$d8b5003e@oemcomputer>
To: "lojban" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <sbb2185d.046@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Set of answers encore
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:59:12 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11128

la .and cusku di'e

> Lojban needs an unambiguous way of distinguishing between
>
> 'intensional believe':   x1 has the thought that x2 is the case
>
> and
>
> 'extensional believe':   The states of affairs that x1 believes
obtain include x2

How about 'jinvi', 'djuno', 'krici', 'tugni', 'sarxe', etc. all
default to extensional, and then the intensional sense can be had with
a tanru or lujvo using 'pensi' (or maybe 'te sidbo'). If x both
extensionally believes that y and also thinks about or forms an idea
about y then x intensionally believes that y, no?

mu'o mi'e .adam.