From rob@twcny.rr.com Fri Sep 14 19:01:56 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 15 Sep 2001 02:01:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 77862 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2001 01:52:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Sep 2001 01:52:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.125) by mta2 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2001 01:52:55 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139]) by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id f8F1ppw20904 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:51:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:51:50 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15i4d7-0000Zu-00 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:52:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:52:24 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] (from lojban-beginners) pi'e Message-ID: <20010914215224.A2071@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010914210625.00aacf00@pop.cais.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010914210625.00aacf00@pop.cais.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10735 de'i li 2001:9:14 : 21:12:17 ti'u la EDT la lojbab. pu cusku di'e > Now maybe we shouldn't be hamstrung by the baseline if enough people want a > change, but part of the reason for having a baseline is to hamstring those > who would change by fiat. (If you evolve a change through usage, of > course, I cannot argue with you). I think the date issue is one that would be very easy to evolve by usage. There will never be a 2001st day of any month, and so there is no need for conventions to attempt to figure out which form someone is using. Now for a slight digression. Is ":" representing {pi'e} officially recognized anywhere, or is it just a shortcut in jbofi'e? It is nice to have. -- la rab.spir noi sarji zo gumri