From phma@oltronics.net Sun Sep 09 18:11:21 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 10 Sep 2001 01:11:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 74207 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 01:11:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Sep 2001 01:11:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.228) by mta1 with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 01:11:11 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 163FD3C573; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 21:05:22 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Questions and observations about taxonomy Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 21:05:19 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01090921051930.05217@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10610 On Wednesday 05 September 2001 12:26, James F. Carter wrote: > The whole order Primates. It's pretty clear from the way all the keywords > are strung out that that was the original intent. And then "la broda cu > smani" is literally true. Anyone familiar with USA politics knows the > referent of "la broda". Could be. But {smani} could also mean the Haplorhini (which includes tarsiers, monkeys, apes, and man, but excludes lorises, lemurs, and galagos) or the older taxon Simiae (sp?) (which is Haplorhini minus the tarsiers, which were considered prosimians). The langur I sit here, the lemur I get. phma