From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Sep 30 10:25:24 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 30 Sep 2001 17:23:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 57124 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2001 17:23:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 30 Sep 2001 17:23:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 30 Sep 2001 17:25:24 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A583BF00094; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:25:23 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: "Lojban@Yahoogroups. Com" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] chinese whispers
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 13:25:17 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFCECHCEAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <01093000274215.01489@neofelis>
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11214

>> I've just despatched my englishing of Pierre off to Jorge.
>> One paragraph is plenty long enough for the time it takes
>> to do it, but nowhere near long enough for there to be
>> enough context for glorking to be better than vague guesswork.

>It was already hard enough to make sense of when I got it!

My fault, I got a few strange lines in there... not too many, but enough to
be confusing. Few enough that I recognized the source (or thought I did),
but using that to help would be cheating, so it's not the clearest it could
be. I was the one before la pier.

                             --la kreig.daniyl.

     'segu le bavli temci gi mi'o renvi lo purci
     .i ga le fonxa janbe gi du mi'
                     -la djimis.BYFet

xy.sy. gubmau ckiku nacycme:  0x5C3A1E74