From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Thu Sep 06 17:58:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 00:58:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 95284 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 00:50:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 00:50:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta07-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.47) by mta1 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 00:50:16 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.253.88.88]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20010907005014.NZEW710.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 01:50:14 +0100 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] A serious but ungeneralized new attempt on Q-kau Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 01:49:31 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <10f.49fa9af.28c64825@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10501 > Now do consider this, which I take to be equivalent, but am > blessed if I can prove it: > le I have ke'a for dinner ca ce'u cu depends on le contents of > the fridge ca ce'uxino (I can't work out the way to otherwise > correlate the {ce'u}: This Anglan is too pidgin for me to understand. Can you retry with a slightly closer approximation to Lojban? If you think it worth it, that is. > all x all y if y is a possible dinner on x then for some z, y's being so is > conditioned by z being in the fridge on x. What is x? --And.