From araizen@newmail.net Mon Sep 03 14:49:17 2001
Return-Path: <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 3 Sep 2001 21:49:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 77799 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2001 21:48:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Sep 2001 21:48:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.54.158)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 3 Sep 2001 21:48:20 -0000
Received: from oemcomputer ([62.0.181.142]) by out.newmail.net ; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 00:49:23 +0200
Message-ID: <000101c134ca$b0af4840$8eb5003e@oemcomputer>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <F90vhg1vSiSxRENm5F100003974@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] the set of answers
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:05:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
From: "Adam Raizen" <araizen@newmail.net>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10418

[xorxes' set interpretation of 'makau]

How would you then interpret a 'makau' at the main bridi level? It
claims all the members of the set are true? Or at least one of them?

> >Or, we could reinterpret what the x3 of frica should be and make it
> >into a relationship: "la .dabias. frica la .tcelsis. le ka ce'u se
> >mamta lo na du be le mamta be ce'u".
>
> I don't like that, it makes it much more complicated to use.

Just experimenting.

mu'o mi'e .adam.