From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Thu Sep 06 19:25:26 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_1); 7 Sep 2001 02:25:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 73829 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 02:24:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 7 Sep 2001 02:24:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 7 Sep 2001 02:24:38 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.253.84.2]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
          id <20010907022436.JEEW288.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
          for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 03:24:36 +0100
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: ce'u
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 03:23:44 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMIELBEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <9n98s4+iglj@eGroups.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 10508

Adam:
> la .and. cusku di'e
> 
> > A fatci is something that is true of the local universe. A ka'e
> fatci
> > then is something that could be true of the local universe and a
> ca'a
> > fatci is something that actually is true of the local universe. 
> > "X dies before X is born" is not a ka'e fatci. "I live in Paris" is
> > a ka'e but not a ca'a fatci. "I live in London" is a ka'e and a ca'a
> > fatci.
> 
> So 'nu' is to 'fasnu' as 'du'u' is to what?

'bridi'
 
> > This is indeed a matter on the philosophical end of semantics rather
> than 
> > the grammatical end. However, if the semantics of "nu" has even the
> > most microscopic resemblance to what "event" means, then a nu is
> something
> > that consists of a portion of spacetime. "2+2=4" does not consist of
> a
> > portion of spacetime.
> 
> .i mi na tugni fi le du'u le du'u li re su'i re du li vo cu canlu
> najenai se ditcu

I can never remember what those compound connectives mean, and I can't
work out "ditcu" either. So I don't understand what you're disagreeing
about. If you think "2+2=4" consists of a portion of spacetime, which
portion is it?