From pycyn@aol.com Thu Sep 27 17:00:15 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 28 Sep 2001 00:00:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 67384 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2001 00:00:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.4.52 with QMQP; 28 Sep 2001 00:00:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r03.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.99) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Sep 2001 23:59:46 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.134.243c504 (1839) for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <134.243c504.28e5176e@aol.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:42 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] periodic hexadecimal reminder To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_134.243c504.28e5176e_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11142 --part1_134.243c504.28e5176e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ummmm. Is it not the case that the base of a number when specified by {ju'u} has to be given in decimal, the Lojbanic default? If it were given in some other base, that would have to be specified by another {ju'u} in decimal -- and so on back. So, specifying bases does not seem to be a real problem (or have I missed something dropping in late on this from indirect-question-land?) --part1_134.243c504.28e5176e_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ummmm. Is it not the case that the base of a number when specified by {ju'u} has to be given in decimal, the Lojbanic default? If it were given in some other base, that would have to be specified by another {ju'u} in decimal -- and so on back. So, specifying bases does not seem to be a real problem (or have I missed something dropping in late on this from indirect-question-land?) --part1_134.243c504.28e5176e_boundary--