From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Oct 15 07:38:19 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 15 Oct 2001 14:38:19 -0000
Received: (qmail 96606 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2001 14:37:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Oct 2001 14:37:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2001 14:37:46 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.98] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A4B8710F0256; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:37:44 -0400
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] le vlatai be zo damskrima
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:37:54 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFIEHPCEAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
In-Reply-To: <0110142328460N.02047@neofelis>
Importance: Normal
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11581

>I found the word {damskrima} on the sports page and ran it through vlatai,
>which rejected it. I don't see what's wrong with it, other than not making
>much sense. Is this a bug in vlatai, or is it really an invalid word?

My fault. It is a misformed type-3 fu'ivla which should have been
dambrskrima. It refers to fencing, escrime in french (which is the
international language of fencing) and similar things in other romance
languages.