From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Oct 06 15:30:46 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 6 Oct 2001 22:30:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 83936 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2001 22:30:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by 10.1.1.222 with QMQP; 6 Oct 2001 22:30:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.102)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2001 22:30:46 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Sat, 6 Oct 2001 15:30:46 -0700
Received: from 200.41.247.35 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:30:46 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.35]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Bcc: 
Subject: RE: [lojban] translation exercise
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 22:30:46 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F102it2Ir2mIPUpcaY70000bbaa@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2001 22:30:46.0325 (UTC) FILETIME=[8AD40650:01C14EB6]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11400


la and cusku di'e

>i.e. {le fenki cu se kavbu pu le nu fy catra da}
>
>I don't think this is any good, because you're not talking about
>each of certain specific events. Better would be
>
>{le fenki cu se kavbu pu ro co'e nu fy catra da}
>
>or somesuch.

Yes, {le} is no good. Unlike {ro nu}, {le nu} = {le su'o nu}
does have existential import.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp