From rob@twcny.rr.com Mon Oct 08 14:33:24 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 8 Oct 2001 21:33:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 81326 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2001 21:16:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 8 Oct 2001 21:16:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout6.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.125) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2001 21:16:57 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-1 [24.92.226.139]) by mailout6.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.6/Road Runner 1.12) with ESMTP id f98LFwH22812 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from riff ([24.92.246.4]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:15:57 -0400 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15qhl0-0000Xy-00 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:16:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:16:14 -0400 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: noxemol ce'u Message-ID: <20011008171614.B2062@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11471 On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 04:26:30PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > Does this "permission" mean that you will not kick up any more ruckuses > if I proceed? i rahter thought not. Certainly. If you can use this version of {ce'u} in Lojban and people understand you and start using it as well, then more power to you. -- la rab.spir noi sarji zo gumri