From eks2@york.ac.uk Tue Oct 30 07:26:44 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: eks2@york.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 15:26:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 28373 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 15:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 15:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n10.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.10.49) by mta1 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 15:26:43 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: eks2@york.ac.uk Received: from [10.1.10.28] by n10.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 30 Oct 2001 15:26:43 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:26:41 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Moss and lichen Message-ID: <9rmgrh+2kfa@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <0110292124000H.01133@neofelis> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 426 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 144.32.128.133 From: "Evgueni Sklyanin" X-Yahoo-Profile: sklyanin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11772 --- In lojban@y..., Pierre Abbat wrote: > There is a gismu {clika} which is glossed as moss or lichen. Which is it? The > two are completely different and are not even in the same kingdom. voc gives > ucna > laikn > liken > cian > kai > lica > of which I recognize only the English and the Spanish. > > phma The last one, {lica}, is apparently from Russian {licainik} = "lichen" mi'e .evgenis.