From gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch Sat Oct 13 11:39:37 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 13 Oct 2001 18:39:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 19761 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2001 18:39:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.220 with QMQP; 13 Oct 2001 18:39:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n1.groups.yahoo.com) (216.115.96.51) by mta3 with SMTP; 13 Oct 2001 18:39:36 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch Received: from [10.1.2.11] by n1.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Oct 2001 18:39:35 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 18:39:34 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: re : translation challenge: "If today is Monday..." Message-ID: <9qa1p6+qhu3@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <20011013140124.B813@twcny.rr.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 787 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 213.3.45.125 From: gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11559 --- In lojban@y..., Rob Speer wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 01:28:12PM +0200, G. Dyke wrote: > > I don't like {mu'ei} ! (I had written a long paragraph explaining why, but I > > erased it 'cause much of what I said doesn't make sense - I suppose I just > > don't like the idea of lojban not being able to express something which is > > so obvious in natural language) > > ... what? > > Because you don't like the idea of Lojban not being able to express the > subjunctive, you argue _against_ the thing which would make it > expressible? No, I believe there _must_ be a way to express a subjunctive... call it my faith in lojban. Once it is proven to me that there _is_ no way, I will find mu'ei agreable. > > -- > la rab.spir > noi sarji zo mu'ei