From ragnarok@pobox.com Mon Oct 29 15:09:22 2001
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 29 Oct 2001 23:09:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 60607 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2001 23:09:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142)
  by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Oct 2001 23:09:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta3 with SMTP; 29 Oct 2001 23:09:18 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.98] by intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A1A0924801F4; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:09:20 -0500
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] observatives (was RE: a construal of lo'e & le'e
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:02:40 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFOEKKCEAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20011029164251.A879@twcny.rr.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: xreig
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11757

>> So anyway, it seems the rule for Lojban is that a zo'e x1 cannot be
>> elided.

>I rather hope you mean Loglan! I'm rather certain that Lojban does not
>suffer from this flaw.

Same here. I do it all the time. In loglan, however, empty x1 is how you
form commands (cf "Vizka la Spat")