From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sun Oct 21 14:59:53 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 21 Oct 2001 21:59:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 94574 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2001 21:59:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Oct 2001 21:59:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta02-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.42) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2001 21:59:52 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.255.41.94]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20011021215950.GCOB7202.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 22:59:50 +0100 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Digest Number 1094 Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 22:59:08 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <001101c15967$b4c69020$4f2aca3e@oemcomputer> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11645 Greg: > > Rob takes > > it as "when" and renders it as "calenu", which Greg renders well as > > "while". > > xod: > an interval("while").> > > True; I should have preferred the point-event abstractor though. "when" > would usually implie a "very short time after", so I decided on while. I agree with both of you. Perhaps "At the time when..." might have been better. --And.