From phma@oltronics.net Thu Oct 25 06:29:05 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 25 Oct 2001 13:29:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 19719 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2001 13:29:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 25 Oct 2001 13:29:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.244) by mta2 with SMTP; 25 Oct 2001 13:28:29 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id CEB923C586; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 00:55:33 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: latna: Lotus or Nelumbo? Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 00:55:30 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0110250055300A.06830@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11666 Wading through pages about corporate taxonomy software by Lotus, I found that there are two completely different plants called lotus: the genus Lotus, which is in the family Fabaceae, and the genus Nelumbo, in the family Nelumbonaceae. The flattish seed head with some twenty holes with a seed in each is Nelumbo. Which is latna? phma