From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Wed Oct 31 09:12:40 2001
Return-Path: <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 31 Oct 2001 17:12:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 72658 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2001 17:12:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27)
  by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 31 Oct 2001 17:12:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3)
  by mta2 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2001 17:12:26 -0000
Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer);
          Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:48:54 +0000
Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk
          with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:23:26 +0000
Message-Id: <sbe0338e.096@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:23:10 +0000
To: jjllambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com>, lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11814

>>> Jorge Llambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com> 10/30/01 11:54pm >>>
[...]
#The easy way out is to say {lo'e remna cu relyselkanla}.
#
#Otherwise I think you have to say:
#
#          lo'e kanla reroi kanla lo'e remna
#          The Eye eyes the Human twice.

Nothing wrong with this, but I don't see a problem with=20
"re da kanla lo'e remna". Abstract away to a conceptual
realm where there is just Mr Human (some thinkers may
already be in that realm, of course), and check through
everything in the universe to find whether there are
exactly two things that be-eye him [sorry for sexism].
And so there are.

--And.