From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Tue Oct 30 07:59:13 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 15:59:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 43521 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 15:57:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 15:57:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 15:57:50 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Tue, 30 Oct 2001 15:33:55 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:07:49 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:07:36 +0000 To: lojban Subject: SE--FA interaction Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11774 AFAICR, FA numbering applies to the OUTPUT of SE conversion. Is this correc= t? It would be easier if FA numbering were unaffected by SE conversion. --And.