From pycyn@aol.com Tue Oct 30 11:07:07 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 30 Oct 2001 19:07:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 172 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2001 19:07:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 30 Oct 2001 19:07:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m02.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.5) by mta2 with SMTP; 30 Oct 2001 19:07:06 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.8.) id r.a1.1d721a35 (4539) for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:07:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 14:07:00 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] SE--FA interaction To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_a1.1d721a35.29105454_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10535 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11782 --part1_a1.1d721a35.29105454_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/30/2001 12:06:25 PM Central Standard Time, arosta@uclan.ac.uk writes: > The discussion of word orders has prompted me to revive a once-abandoned > exercise of working out the easiest way to order 5 sumti places (i) in a > bridi > for each relevant possible position of the selbri, and (ii) in a sumti tail > (where > selbri position is fixed and x1 can't be fa-tagged). > > Has anybody ever bothered to do this before & written up the results? > It was done for Loglan before 1980 and written up in The Loglanist, I don't remember when exactly. I don't think Lojban changes the situation. --part1_a1.1d721a35.29105454_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 10/30/2001 12:06:25 PM Central Standard Time, arosta@uclan.ac.uk writes:


The discussion of word orders has prompted me to revive a once-abandoned
exercise of working out the easiest way to order 5 sumti places (i) in a bridi
for each relevant possible position of the selbri, and (ii) in a sumti tail (where
selbri position is fixed and x1 can't be fa-tagged).

Has anybody ever bothered to do this before & written up the results?


It was done for Loglan before 1980 and written up in The Loglanist, I don't remember when exactly.  I don't think Lojban changes the situation. --part1_a1.1d721a35.29105454_boundary--