From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Tue Oct 09 10:35:17 2001
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_4_1); 9 Oct 2001 17:32:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 24493 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2001 17:32:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.1.224 with QMQP; 9 Oct 2001 17:32:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO n1.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.10.40)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 9 Oct 2001 17:35:15 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.4.68] by n1.groups.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Oct 2001 17:35:12 -0000
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 17:35:14 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: repeating until feedback given
Message-ID: <9pvcgi+e4op@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <155.23863ae.28f46920@aol.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 721
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 62.104.218.72
From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11486

--- In lojban@y..., pycyn@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 10/9/2001 6:39:29 AM Central Daylight Time, 
> Ti@f... writes:
> 
> 
> > ni'o lonu zasti ce lonu na zasti cu finsi'u
> > .i lonu nandu ce lonu frili cu riksi'u 
> > .i lo'i clani ce lo'i tordu cu mresi'u 
> > .i loka galtu ce loka dizlu cu bapsi'u
> > .i lo voksa joi ro voksa cu saxsi'u 
> > .i lo purci ce lo bavli cu jeirsi'u 
> > 
> 
> Many thanks, we deferred the right way indeed.

At least the last line (beside typos) seems more than problematic and doesn't convey the very meaning.
Maybe it should be given as:

.i lo purci lo balvi ca katyje'i or .i caku lo purci lo balvi cu katyje'i
- not only a  linguistical problem :(

mi'e .aulun.