From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Nov 10 17:58:14 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 11 Nov 2001 01:58:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 42033 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2001 01:58:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Nov 2001 01:58:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.149) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2001 01:58:14 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 17:58:14 -0800 Received: from 200.41.247.38 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 01:58:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.38] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Language of Logic and Logical Language. Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 01:58:14 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Nov 2001 01:58:14.0464 (UTC) FILETIME=[52F48C00:01C16A54] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 12017 la pier cusku di'e >I do it all the time. For example: > >Ruth 2:3. .i ko'e klama gi'e velvi'ucrepu le grustani [pl] le foldi [sg] le >crepu [pl] But do you really want to say that ko'e harvests each grustani from each field? (I don't get the last le crepu.) This is the problems you get into when you use {le} for more than one referent, the sentence gets multiplied into many more relationships than intended. {lei grustani}, {lei foldi} does not have that problem. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp