From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Thu Nov 01 20:26:08 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 2 Nov 2001 04:26:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 60215 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2001 04:26:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172)
  by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Nov 2001 04:26:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.45)
  by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 2001 04:26:07 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.255.40.53]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP
          id <20011102042605.DZWI6072.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
          for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 04:26:05 +0000
Reply-To: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: countability (was: RE: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 04:25:22 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMKENNEOAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0111011617300.4918-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11863

xod:
> Has this discussion yet given me practical, uncontroversial advice on when
> to use which gadri?

No, because there's not enough agreement. I could give you practical advice
on when to use which gadri, but it wouldn't be uncontroversial.

I'll try to get round to writing up my advice soonish, in case it may be
of some use.

--And.