From phma@oltronics.net Thu Nov 01 15:00:27 2001
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 1 Nov 2001 23:00:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 77490 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 23:00:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26)
  by 10.1.1.224 with QMQP; 1 Nov 2001 23:00:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.236)
  by mta1 with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 23:00:23 -0000
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 54AB93C550; Thu,  1 Nov 2001 17:42:19 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: countability (was: RE: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:42:17 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <sbe16f87.067@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk> <3BE1A154.4080603@reutershealth.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BE1A154.4080603@reutershealth.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0111011742170G.20884@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11851

On Thursday 01 November 2001 14:24, John Cowan wrote:
li'o
> Even without the Chinese example, it is far from clear that the
> count/mass distinction is very natural: rice is mass, oats are
> count (or are they mass with a false plural suffix?), peas used
> to be mass but are now count (pease > peas, generating the unhistorical
> singular "pea").

We say "oat groats" but not "an oat", though we do say "a bean" or "a pea". I 
have been known to say "a spaghetto". We say "oat groats", but do we say "an 
oat groat"? Which reminds me: I oat to finish Ezekiel 4, with his gurni joi 
dembi nanba poi citka ke'a ca'o lenu vreta fi'o zbepi le mlana.

mu'omi'e. pier.