From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sun Nov 04 12:26:55 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 4 Nov 2001 20:26:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 88292 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2001 20:26:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m12.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Nov 2001 20:26:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2001 20:26:54 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.255.41.242]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20011104202653.EDTC21455.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 20:26:53 +0000 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] lo with discourse-scope? Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 20:26:09 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 11932 pc: > a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com writes: > > . I call it the Goatleg Rule. "At least 1" is "su'o pa". > "Pa" on its own is "exactly 1, and no more". > > Why Goatleg rule? Because I first found out about it when John explained that "ro -goat se tuple re da" is false (even restricting goats to those with 4 legs). To me this rule is a perennial Gotcha (that which catches one out when one isn't being careful). --And.