From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Nov 14 05:40:07 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 14 Nov 2001 13:40:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 91823 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2001 13:40:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2001 13:40:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2001 13:40:05 -0000 Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA18188; Wed, 14 Nov 2001 08:41:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3BF274A8.2070903@reutershealth.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 08:42:00 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jay Kominek Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: ca'a pu (was: Why is there so much irregularity in cmavo/gismu?) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 12123 Jay Kominek wrote: > {mi ca'a pu broda} does not work. If so, that is a bug: ku is not required after a free-standing modal (unlike after "na"), so ca'a pu is just ca'a[ku] pu. -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel