From jay.kominek@colorado.edu Fri Nov 30 22:07:28 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 1 Dec 2001 06:07:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 95338 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 06:07:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Dec 2001 06:07:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ucsub.colorado.edu) (128.138.129.12) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 06:07:28 -0000 Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu (kominek@ucsub.colorado.edu [128.138.129.12]) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/student) with ESMTP id fB167SC16530 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:07:28 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:07:28 -0700 (MST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] The bigness of a set In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE From: Jay Kominek X-Yahoo-Profile: jfkominek X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 12427 On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Invent Yourself wrote: > Typically "lo'i ratcu" means {the set of rats}. In this case it means {th= e > cardinality of the set of rats}. Why? lo'i ratcu cu barda -cardinality zo'e barda's x2 seems to solve this problem. What is unsatisfactory about it? (And of course cardinality can be taken care of by "zo'e") - Jay Kominek Plus =C3=A7a change, plus c'est la m=C3=AAme chose