From cmeclax@gmx.co.uk Tue Nov 13 09:32:11 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 13 Nov 2001 17:32:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 92754 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2001 17:32:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Nov 2001 17:32:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (216.189.29.227) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2001 17:32:02 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 504) id 9451A3C98A; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:16:36 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: normal vs average Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:16:29 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Comment: li 0x6E5F017970D41E6AECE3B3860444EBC548C0C651 cu sevzi le mi ckiku MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01111309162900.22785@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 12090 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 How do we distinguish normal (as opposed to abnormal, which indicates something's wrong) from average (mean, median, mode)? Which is cnano? My average reliability figures, because of floods, have recently been quite abnormal! cmeclax -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE78StCBETrxUjAxlERArEbAKCdNfsOzDdrohacGd4gcD3wUAecpwCfW8Yh qGQKZhw6r9hRS7ro3YjRqm4= =Dqbj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----