From xod@sixgirls.org Wed Dec 05 20:57:53 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@reva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 6 Dec 2001 04:57:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 68260 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2001 04:57:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Dec 2001 04:57:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO reva.sixgirls.org) (216.27.131.50) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Dec 2001 04:57:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reva.sixgirls.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB64vqQ08448 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:57:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 23:57:51 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] [WWW] browser usage statistics (was: Big update!) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1138703 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 12494 On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Jay Kominek wrote: > BrowserWatch pegs Internet Explorer with 86.8% of users, Netscape (all > versions combined) with 6.77%, Opera and lynx with 2.2% and 1.1% > respectively. That agrees with Google's Zeitgeist data. I don't expect anyone to reconsider any page rendering issues just for me, but as crashy as NS 4.7 Linux is (and it is!), it renders pages faster and better than Opera (version as of 3 weeks ago) or Mozilla (that shipped with Mandrake 8.0) or Konqueror. -- The tao that can be tar(1)ed is not the entire Tao. The path that can be specified is not the Full Path.