From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 07 10:18:34 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 7 Dec 2001 18:18:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 6817 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 18:18:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2001 18:18:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 18:18:34 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16CPa1-0001E0-00 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2001 10:18:37 -0800 Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:18:37 -0800 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] [WWWW] Big update! Message-ID: <20011207181837.GC8558@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i From: Robin Lee Powell X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=66827819 X-Yahoo-Profile: robinleepowell X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 12534 On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 09:15:39PM -0500, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > But, as I said with regret, you keep doing the same thing over and over > again, hence my repeated > comments. I am aware that you are doing your best > to make something work on Netscape that works fine on other things and that > is a nice feature, but backwards. If most people use Netscape, then the > right way to do things is to get it good on Netscape and then do as much as > possible to get it looking good on other browsers. Once again, you don't know what you're talking about. I am no longer going to converse with you on this thread. -Robin, who works with computers for a living, thankyouverymuch. -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/