From BestATN@aol.com Mon Dec 10 06:06:28 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: BestATN@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_2); 10 Dec 2001 14:06:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 77648 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 14:06:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Dec 2001 14:06:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r01.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.97) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 14:06:27 -0000 Received: from BestATN@aol.com by imo-r01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.9.) id r.164.559d363 (4552) for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:06:22 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <164.559d363.29461b5d@aol.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 09:06:21 EST Subject: full bull To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_164.559d363.29461b5d_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10536 From: BestATN@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1155066 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 12569 --part1_164.559d363.29461b5d_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit the term "full bull" as used by two people seems to have two apparently unrelated meanings. in the first case, i thought it meant something like "a lot of money". in the second one it seems to mean more like "derogatory and inflammatory criticism". what does it really mean? steven lytle >..and I know a guy who made full >bull just on the basis of papers correcting the successive editions of a >notoriously sloppy -- but very popular -- logic text.) And creating web sites for the vagaries of multiple browsers is a good industry as well, which many users pay enormous amounts of money for. And we have (more than) one person who does this kind of "correcting crap" for part of his living who is doing our web site for free. But he is getting "full bull" only from you. --part1_164.559d363.29461b5d_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit the term "full bull" as used by two people seems to have two apparently unrelated meanings.  in the first case, i thought it meant something like "a lot of money". in the second one it seems to mean more like "derogatory and inflammatory criticism".   what does it really mean?  
steven lytle

>..and I know a guy who made full
>bull just on the basis of papers correcting the successive editions of a
>notoriously sloppy -- but very popular -- logic text.)

And creating web sites for the vagaries of multiple browsers is a good
industry as well, which many users pay enormous amounts of money for.  And
we have (more than) one person who does this kind of "correcting crap" for
part of his living who is doing our web site for free.  But he is getting
"full bull" only from you.
--part1_164.559d363.29461b5d_boundary--