From pycyn@aol.com Thu Jan 31 08:39:15 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 31 Jan 2002 16:39:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 31149 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 16:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Jan 2002 16:39:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d04.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.36) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 16:39:14 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.26.) id r.12a.b7ef29f (18708) for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:39:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <12a.b7ef29f.298acd2b@aol.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:39:07 EST Subject: Re: Truth Value of UI (was: Re: UI for 'possible' (was: Re: [lojban] Bibletra... To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_12a.b7ef29f.298acd2b_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13131 --part1_12a.b7ef29f.298acd2b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/31/2002 10:05:32 AM Central Standard Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes: > How do you intend to prove to me that ".ui" lacks a truth value? > This looks like a foundational belief: if you don't see it, I don't suppose I can prove it to you. It will make much that you say later suspect or unintelligible or subject to global reinterpretation, but you can talk that way -- and believe that way -- if you want. The distinction -- however you express it or ignore it -- will remain. --part1_12a.b7ef29f.298acd2b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/31/2002 10:05:32 AM Central Standard Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes:


How do you intend to prove to me that ".ui" lacks a truth value?

This looks like a foundational belief: if you don't see it, I don't suppose I can prove it to you.  It will make much that you say later suspect or unintelligible or subject to global reinterpretation, but you can talk that way -- and believe that way -- if you want.  The distinction -- however you express it or ignore it -- will remain. --part1_12a.b7ef29f.298acd2b_boundary--