From thanatos@dim.com Fri Feb 15 20:42:27 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: thanatos@dim.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 16 Feb 2002 04:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 34352 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2002 04:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Feb 2002 04:42:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO supernova.dimensional.com) (206.124.0.11) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2002 04:42:24 -0000 Received: from p09.3c04.pm.dimcom.net (p09.3c04.pm.dimcom.net [206.124.3.169]) by supernova.dimensional.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g1G4gNX21669 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 21:42:23 -0700 (MST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Non-logical AND in Tanru? Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 21:47:47 -0700 Message-ID: References: <140.990985b.299e7417@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <140.990985b.299e7417@aol.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: EWC X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=45881577 X-Yahoo-Profile: thandim2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13314 On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:24:23 EST, pycyn@aol.com wrote: >> If the bridi containing the >> tanru is true, then the tertau holds true for some arguments (given in >> the bridi) and the seltau holds true for some arguments (left >> unspecified unless made explicit). If {mi broda klama} is true, then >> there must exist something that is broda for me to stand in an ambiguous >> broda klama relation to. >Nice. >I'm not sure it is unqualifiedly true Well, if {no da broda} is true, what meaning could {mi broda klama} possibly have? If there weren't any real, imagined, or theoretical things that were broda, what meaning would broda have? And then what of {mi broda klama}? --=20 EWC