From BestATN@aol.com Wed Feb 20 15:56:56 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: BestATN@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 20 Feb 2002 23:56:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 58918 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 23:56:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m10.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Feb 2002 23:56:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m02.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.5) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 23:56:55 -0000 Received: from BestATN@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.3a.224de5e6 (3949) for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:56:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3a.224de5e6.29a591ba@aol.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 18:56:42 EST Subject: glosses To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_3a.224de5e6.29a591ba_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10556 From: BestATN@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1155066 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13389 --part1_3a.224de5e6.29a591ba_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit greg, i find the use of 'gray' instead of 'grey' and 'color' instead of 'colour' to be quite normal, and in fact, i hadn't noticed it. as a frequent user lately of logflash, i am extremely glad that no such british spellings are part of the glosses. it would be a constant irritation, and i presume that's how you feel about the current state. on the other hand, i agree with you about the gloss for ".i". in fact, any gloss of uniquely lojban terms, such as "cmavo", "rafsi", "tanru", etc., is mighty annoying to me, because the lojban words are the terms i use in english, not 'structure word', 'affix', 'phrase compound' and the like. steven lytle --part1_3a.224de5e6.29a591ba_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit greg,
i find the use of 'gray' instead of 'grey' and 'color' instead of 'colour' to be quite normal, and in fact, i hadn't noticed it.  as a frequent user lately of logflash, i am extremely glad that no such british spellings are part of the glosses.  it would be a constant irritation, and i presume that's how you feel about the current state.  
on the other hand, i agree with you about the gloss for ".i".  in fact, any gloss of uniquely lojban terms, such as "cmavo", "rafsi", "tanru", etc., is mighty annoying to me, because the lojban words are the terms i use in english, not 'structure word', 'affix', 'phrase compound' and the like.
steven lytle --part1_3a.224de5e6.29a591ba_boundary--