From pycyn@aol.com Thu Feb 21 16:45:45 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 22 Feb 2002 00:45:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 8583 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2002 00:41:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Feb 2002 00:41:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-d06.mx.aol.com) (205.188.157.38) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2002 00:41:34 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.94.21e4ff90 (18711) for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:41:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <94.21e4ff90.29a6edb6@aol.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:41:26 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_94.21e4ff90.29a6edb6_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13393 --part1_94.21e4ff90.29a6edb6_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/21/2002 6:25:55 PM Central Standard Time, araizen@newmail.net writes: > Since we've been interpreting properties as functions, I think it > works well. 'la barbras mapti la dabias le ka ce'u mamta makau.' What > would you put in the third place that doesn't work? I suppose that the > place structure of at least 'sarxe' and 'ckini' look equally tempting, > but I think 'mapti' looks best. (Though this then brings up the > question, what is the difference between the three.) > I would have read it as {le du'u makau mamta ce'u}, since I take {ceu} as the argument and {makau} as the value (and have a different use for {ka} altogether). But these things still to be up in the air. --part1_94.21e4ff90.29a6edb6_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/21/2002 6:25:55 PM Central Standard Time, araizen@newmail.net writes:


Since we've been interpreting properties as functions, I think it
works well. 'la barbras mapti la dabias le ka ce'u mamta makau.' What
would you put in the third place that doesn't work? I suppose that the
place structure of at least 'sarxe' and 'ckini' look equally tempting,
but I think 'mapti' looks best. (Though this then brings up the
question, what is the difference between the three.)


I would have read it as {le du'u makau mamta ce'u}, since I take {ceu} as the argument and {makau} as the value (and have a different use for {ka} altogether).  But these things still to be up in the air. --part1_94.21e4ff90.29a6edb6_boundary--