From thanatos@dim.com Thu Feb 14 15:03:30 2002
Return-Path: <thanatos@dim.com>
X-Sender: thanatos@dim.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_2); 14 Feb 2002 23:03:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 82736 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2002 23:03:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171)
  by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Feb 2002 23:03:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO supernova.dimensional.com) (206.124.0.11)
  by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2002 23:03:29 -0000
Received: from p25.3c04.pm.dimcom.net (p25.3c04.pm.dimcom.net [206.124.3.185])
	by supernova.dimensional.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g1EN3RX25657
	for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:03:28 -0700 (MST)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Reversing Tanru (was:  Non-logical AND in Tanru?)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:08:47 -0700
Message-ID: <77co6u4rtqlbcukiaa946r5517as90fjpu@4ax.com>
References: <29.22a46ca7.299d7a02@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <29.22a46ca7.299d7a02@aol.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: EWC <thanatos@dim.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=45881577
X-Yahoo-Profile: thandim2000
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13298

On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:37:22 EST, pycyn@aol.com wrote:

>In a message dated 2/14/2002 12:01:27 PM Central Standard Time,=20
>thanatos@dim.com writes:
>> 1. ta melbi je nixli ckule
>> 2. ta ckule co melbi je nixli
>> 3. melbi je nixli co ckule befa ta

>> 4. ckule befa ta melbi je nixli

>I would have thought that this needed {co}, unless you really want {ckule}=
=20
>modifying {melba je nixli}.  If that is what you want, then neither 3 nor =
4=20
>are at all like 1 and 2.

I would have thought that tanru are reversible as long as you drag along
the appropriate sumti with "be".

If I am going to a cinema, then the following tanru are nearly identical
save for emphasis:

1. mi skina klama
2. zo'e skina co klama befa mi

To say that I, a goer, am somehow related to some cinema is also to say
that some cinema is somehow related to me, a goer.

>And indeed not readily comprehended: "lo, a this-is-a-school type of=20
>beautiful thing and girl."  It is somewhat easier without the {be fa ta}.

The emphasis is changed if you switch the seltau and tertau, but the
underlying relations expressed don't change. {ckule nixli} is a direct
translation of "schoolgirl", and while not the best translation isn't
false.  A schoolgirl is a girl and related to something which is a
school.  {melbi nixli} doesn't need any handwaving.  So, {melbi je nixli
co ckule befa ta}, could be spontaneously uttered for "Hey look, a cute
girl, of that school."

In that way "co" can be used to add essentially an entire related bridi
in afterthought.

{mi le zdani cu klama co ragve le rirxe le ckule}

That may not be an academic use of "co", but it's useful in
conversation.

--=20
EWC