From thanatos@dim.com Tue Feb 26 10:52:54 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: thanatos@dim.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 26 Feb 2002 18:52:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 33029 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2002 18:52:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.172) by m9.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Feb 2002 18:52:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO supernova.dimensional.com) (206.124.0.11) by mta2.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2002 18:52:53 -0000 Received: from p08.3c07.pm.dimcom.net (p08.3c07.pm.dimcom.net [206.124.5.72]) by supernova.dimensional.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g1QIqqf29003 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:52:52 -0700 (MST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: go'i: repeated referents or just sumti? Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 11:58:47 -0700 Message-ID: <3skn7ugfa3vfc970iuq5lvshf58651ee4a@4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: EWC X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=45881577 X-Yahoo-Profile: thandim2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13407 Does {go'i} repeat the referents of the sumti of the previous the bridi or just the sumti? That is, does {le mlatu cu catlu mi. i go'i le gerku} necessarily refer to the same cats in the second statement or just another group of {ro le su'o mlatu}? Is le mlatu cu catlu mi. i go'i le gerku the same as le mlatu cu catlu mi. i le mlatu cu catlu le gerku or le mlatu cu catlu mi. e le gerku ? In the last the same X described as a cat looks at both me and the dog, while in the middle one the X looking at me is not necessarily the Y looking at the dog. Which one is {go'i} equivalent to? --=20 EWC