From pycyn@aol.com Tue Mar 05 20:50:37 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: unknown); 6 Mar 2002 04:50:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 67704 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2002 02:13:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Mar 2002 02:13:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r07.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.103) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Mar 2002 02:13:13 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id r.12a.d4dec96 (4530) for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:13:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <12a.d4dec96.29b6d531@aol.com> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 21:13:05 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [jboske] RE: Anything but tautologies To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_12a.d4dec96.29b6d531_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 From: pycyn@aol.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=2455001 X-Yahoo-Profile: kaliputra X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13530 --part1_12a.d4dec96.29b6d531_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/5/2002 7:32:15 PM Central Standard Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes: > So to say that fancu1 "is a function" is meaningless. It can only be the > name of a function. > Back to an earlier problem about what {sumti} ir {fancu1} refers to, the text that fills tht slot in a sentence or the object that fits in that place in a relation in the state of affairs picked by a proposition. I suspect this problem is still back of most of this arguments (and probably a few others) as it was in the beginning. And, of course, the fact that, to talk about such things, we have to go up yet another level just makes matters worse. --part1_12a.d4dec96.29b6d531_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/5/2002 7:32:15 PM Central Standard Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes:


So to say that fancu1 "is a function" is meaningless. It can only be the
name of a function.


Back to an earlier problem about what {sumti} ir {fancu1} refers to, the text that fills tht slot in a sentence or the object that fits in that place in a relation in the state of affairs picked by a proposition.  I suspect this problem is still back of most  of this arguments (and probably a few others) as it was in the beginning.  And, of course, the fact that, to talk about such things, we have to go up yet another level just makes matters worse. --part1_12a.d4dec96.29b6d531_boundary--