From a.rosta@ntlworld.com Fri Mar 15 17:47:55 2002
Return-Path: <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@ntlworld.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: unknown); 16 Mar 2002 01:47:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 7341 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2002 01:47:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167)
  by m5.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Mar 2002 01:47:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.45)
  by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Mar 2002 01:47:54 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.253.90.236]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP
          id <20020316014753.FODN7206.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew>
          for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:47:53 +0000
To: "Lojban List" <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] lojban.org transfer, reprise.
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:46:26 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMOEFPFKAA.a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <200203150314.WAA18056@mail.reutershealth.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@ntlworld.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=77248971
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 13807

John Cowan:
> Invent Yourself scripsit:
> 
> > On the other hand, an alternative would almost surely include a sane reply
> > policy for mailing list responses.
> 
> The list has the policy it does because I'm the owner and I believe
> that's the correct policy.  As we have discussed before at wearisome
> length.
> 
> That said, I would not be opposed to leaving Yahoo.

Just to remind people, lojban@jiscmail.ac.uk still exists, if the
community wants to use it. Or it still existed last time I ehecked. It
actually had a handful of subscribers, too, incredibly enough.

Benefits: 
modicum of academic respectability
fairly high public visibility
professionally administered
funded by UK state, so no ads

As I say, it's there if it's wanted. If not, it's happily lying 
dormant.

--And.